Food Ethics Council

GM is back, thanks to the food crisis, prompting election debates in Australia, royal foreboding in Britain and argument over aubergines in India. The latest edition of Food Ethics magazine lays the foundation for constructive dialogue that moves on from stagnant arguments for or against genetic modification.

The key, we argue in the editorial, is to ask an open question: not ‘do we need GM?’ – the question now occupying the airwaves - but ‘what do we need?’ Calling for a debate about one technology is just a nice way of telling people to like it or loathe it, depending on how you ask.

It is time for a fresh debate about innovation in agriculture but to devote our attention to GM, whether through accident or opportunism, is to ignore tough lessons from a decade of controversy.

Contributors to the magazine take stock of what we can learn from all the wrangling that has already happened over GM foods. They look at how the science, risk management, public trust and even democracy have changed. On risk, for example, they find regulators have made real progress in grappling with the social issues that inevitably inform their judgement, yet there is some way to go before decision-makers manage do this in ways that are sufficiently clear and accountable.

What does it mean to take such lessons seriously? One implication is that we concentrate more on solving problems and less on arguing over technology. That sounds easy but the consequences are profound. Our scientific institutions, regulatory bodies, innovation policies and intellectual property regimes are a long stretch from being fit for effective problem-solving.

To show what’s at stake, four contributors explain how they’d solve some of the key problems GM foods are claimed to address. Whether the challenge is beating malnutition or boosting the economy, good governance is paramount. This is a key message from the International Assessment for Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), which reported in April, and it deserves to be heard.

Contributing to this edition: Peter Lund | John Dupre | Adrian Ely | Christopher Ritson | Unni Kjaernes | Roger Levett | Tom Wakeford | David Hughes | Andrew Natsios | Robert Newbery | Clare Oxborrow | Dwijen Rangnekar | Sakiko Fukuda-Parr | Adrian Dubock | Tewolde Berham Gebre Egziabher| Lewis Holloway | Pete Riley | Suman Sahai | Ruth Chadwick | Rudolf Buntzel | Monty Jones | Robert Paarlberg | Shiv Visvanathan | Robert Doubleday | Miguel Altieri | James Smith | Penelope Nestel | Anne Liddon | Richard Twine.

Read our press release about the magazine here.

Subscribe to download the magazine (click here)

If you already subscribe, enter your login details on the right of the page to download the full magazine. You can read sample articles by clicking on the links below.

Contents

GM foods: the wrong debate
Tom MacMillan

This much we know...

The science: we have more answers but not enough
Peter Lund (click here for a version with references)

Genetics: DNA is dynamic
John Dupre

Risk: safety is just the start if we want good regulation
Adrian Ely

Risk amplification
Christopher Ritson

Trust: openness is everything
Unni Kjaernes

Choice: less can be more
Roger Levett

Democracy: the GM controversy took the UK a step forward but we now risk going backwards
Tom Wakeford

Power: seed companies are big but not special
David Hughes

The big question

What lessons from a decade of debate?
Tewolde Berham Gebre Egziabher | Robert Newbery | Clare Oxborrow | Dwijen Rangnekar | Sakiko Fukuda-Parr | Adrian Dubock | Andrew Natsios | Pete Riley | Suman Sahai | Rudolf Buntzel | Monty Jones | Robert Paarlberg | Shiv Visvanathan

The innovation agenda

The knowledge economy: good inventions drive more innovation
Robert Doubleday

Sustainable agriculture: small farms show big promise
Miguel Altieri

Food security and development: we need dialogue not rhetoric
James Smith

Micronutrients and hidden hunger: a mix of methods
Penelope Nestel

Comment

What does IAASTD mean for us?
Anne Liddon

Animal engineering
Richard Twine and Lewis Holloway

Regular features

Book reviews

Restaurant review
Ruth Chadwick